True/False:
1. A competitive advantage is typically temporary, unless
its a first-mover advantage.
=True
2. An entry barrier is typically used to influence the
threat of new entrants.
3. Switching cost are typically used to influence the threat
of substitute products or services.
=True
4. The Five Forces Model helps to determine the relative
attractiveness of an industry.
=True
5. Organizations can add value by offering lower prices or
by competing in a distinctive way.
=False
6. An entry barrier is typically used to influence the
rivalry among existing competitors.
7. Competitive advantage occurs when an organization can
significantly impact its market share by being first to
market with a an advantage.
=True
8. Buyer power, supplier power, threat of products or
services, threat of new entrants and rivalry
among existing
competitors are all included in Porter's Five Forces Model.
=True
9. Switching costs are typically used to influence the
threat of substitute products or services.
10. Long Essay.
1. Describe three (3) Porter Generic Strategies. Support
your answer with examples. (12 marks)
=Porter Generic Strategies are cost leadership , differentiation , and focused strategy.
Cost Leadership Strategy.This generic strategy calls for being the low cost producer in an industry for a given level of quality. The firm sells its products either at average industry prices to earn a profit higher than that of rivals, or below the average industry prices to gain market share. In the event of a price war, the firm can maintain some profitability while the competition suffers losses. Even without a price war, as the industry matures and prices decline, the firms that can produce more cheaply will remain profitable for a longer period of time. The cost leadership strategy usually targets a broad market.
Some of the ways that firms acquire cost
advantages are by improving process efficiencies, gaining unique access to a
large source of lower cost materials, making optimal outsourcing and vertical
integration decisions, or avoiding some costs altogether. If competing firms
are unable to lower their costs by a similar amount, the firm may be able to
sustain a competitive advantage based on cost leadership. Firms that succeed in cost leadership often
have the following internal strengths: Access to the capital required to make a
significant investment in production assets; this investment represents a
barrier to entry that many firms may not overcome. Skill in designing products for efficient
manufacturing, for example, having a small component count to shorten the
assembly process. High level of expertise in manufacturing
process engineering. Efficient distribution channels. Each generic strategy has its risks, including
the low-cost strategy. For example, other firms may be able to lower their
costs as well. As technology improves, the competition may be able to leapfrog
the production capabilities, thus eliminating the competitive advantage.
Additionally, several firms following a focus strategy and targeting various
narrow markets may be able to achieve an even lower cost within their segments
and as a group gain significant market share.
Cost Leadership Strategy.This generic strategy calls for being the low cost producer in an industry for a given level of quality. The firm sells its products either at average industry prices to earn a profit higher than that of rivals, or below the average industry prices to gain market share. In the event of a price war, the firm can maintain some profitability while the competition suffers losses. Even without a price war, as the industry matures and prices decline, the firms that can produce more cheaply will remain profitable for a longer period of time. The cost leadership strategy usually targets a broad market.
Some of the ways that firms acquire cost
advantages are by improving process efficiencies, gaining unique access to a
large source of lower cost materials, making optimal outsourcing and vertical
integration decisions, or avoiding some costs altogether. If competing firms
are unable to lower their costs by a similar amount, the firm may be able to
sustain a competitive advantage based on cost leadership. Firms that succeed in cost leadership often
have the following internal strengths: Access to the capital required to make a
significant investment in production assets; this investment represents a
barrier to entry that many firms may not overcome. Skill in designing products for efficient
manufacturing, for example, having a small component count to shorten the
assembly process. High level of expertise in manufacturing
process engineering. Efficient distribution channels. Each generic strategy has its risks, including
the low-cost strategy. For example, other firms may be able to lower their
costs as well. As technology improves, the competition may be able to leapfrog
the production capabilities, thus eliminating the competitive advantage.
Additionally, several firms following a focus strategy and targeting various
narrow markets may be able to achieve an even lower cost within their segments
and as a group gain significant market share.
Differentiation Strategy.A differentiation strategy calls for the
development of a product or service that offers unique attributes that are
valued by customers and that customers perceive to be better than or different
from the products of the competition. The value added by the uniqueness of the
product may allow the firm to charge a premium price for it. The firm hopes
that the higher price will more than cover the extra costs incurred in offering
the unique product. Because of the product's unique attributes, if suppliers
increase their prices the firm may be able to pass along the costs to its
customers who cannot find substitute products easily. Firms that succeed in a differentiation
strategy often have the following internal strengths: Access to leading scientific research. Highly skilled and creative product
development team. Strong sales team with the ability to
successfully communicate the perceived strengths of the product. Corporate reputation for quality and
innovation. The risks associated with a differentiation
strategy include imitation by competitors and changes in customer tastes.
Additionally, various firms pursuing focus strategies may be able to achieve
even greater differentiation in their market segments.
Focus Strategy.The focus strategy concentrates on a narrow
segment and within that segment attempts to achieve either a cost advantage or
differentiation. The premise is that the needs of the group can be better
serviced by focusing entirely on it. A firm using a focus strategy often enjoys
a high degree of customer loyalty, and this entrenched loyalty discourages
other firms from competing directly. Because of their narrow market focus, firms
pursuing a focus strategy have lower volumes and therefore less bargaining
power with their suppliers. However, firms pursuing a differentiation-focused
strategy may be able to pass higher costs on to customers since close
substitute products do not exist. Firms that succeed in a focus strategy are
able to tailor a broad range of product development strengths to a relatively
narrow market segment that they know very well. Some risks of focus strategies include
imitation and changes in the target segments. Furthermore, it may be fairly
easy for a broad-market cost leader to adapt its product in order to compete
directly. Finally, other focusers may be able to carve out sub-segments that
they can serve even better.
2. Porter's Five Forces Model is a one of common tools used
in industry to analyze and develop competitive
advantages. List and describe each of the five (5) forces in Porter's Five
Forces Model.
(20 marks)
Porter's Five Forces Model is a one of common tools used in industry to analyze and develop competitive advantages.Forces in Porter's Five Forces Model.
Buyer Power: High when the buyers have many choices of whom to buy. Low when their choices are few.
Porter's Five Forces Model is a one of common tools used in industry to analyze and develop competitive advantages.Forces in Porter's Five Forces Model.
Buyer Power: High when the buyers have many choices of whom to buy. Low when their choices are few.
Supplier Power: High when the buyers have few choices of
whom to buy from. Low is when their choices are many.
Threat of Substitute Products & Services: High when
there many alternatives to a product or service. Low when there are few
alternatives from which to choose.
Treat for New Entrants: High when it is easy for new
competitors to enter a market. Low when there are significant entry barriers to
entering a market.
Rivalry among Existence Competitors: High when competition
is fierce in a market. Low when competition is more complacent.
3. Michael Porter's Five Forces Model is one of the tools
used by the organization to analyze and develop
competitive advantages. Explain how information technology can develop a
competitive
advantage for each
force in Five Forces Model.
(20 marks)
(20 marks)
Competitive rivalry. This force examines how intense the
competition currently is in the marketplace, which is determined by the number
of existing competitors and what each is capable of doing.
Bargaining power of suppliers. This force analyzes how much
power a business's supplier has and how much control it has over the potential
to raise its prices, which, in turn, would lower a business's profitability.
Bargaining power of customers. This force looks at the power
of the consumer to affect pricing and quality.
Threat of new entrants. This force examines how easy or
difficult it is for competitors to join the marketplace in the industry being
examined.
Threat of substitute products or services. This force
studies how easy it is for consumers to switch from a business's product or
service to that of a competitor.
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan